il34  (R&D Systems)

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: Chimeric brain models to study human glial-neuronal and macroglial-microglial interactions

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116794

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) A schematic procedure for deriving microglia-containing brain organoids by co-culture of ventralized NPCs and PMPs under 3D conditions. Scale bars: 400 μm. (B and C) Representative images (B) and quantification (C) of PU.1 + /CD45 + cells in day 9 brain organoids ( n = 3 from three independent experiments). Scale bars: 20 μm. (D) Representative images of CD45 + cells in 1-month organoids. Scale bar: 20 μm. (E) Representative raw fluorescent super-resolution and 3D surface-rendered images showing colocalization of SOX2 + and hTMEM119 + cells in 1-month organoids. Scale bars: 20 μm and 5 μm in the original and enlarged images, respectively. (F) Representative images of TUJ-1 + and GABA + cells in 1-month organoids. Scale bars: 10 μm. (G) Representative images of S100B + cells in 1-month organoids. Scale bars: 20 μm. (H) Quantification of SOX2 + , TUJ-1 + , GABA + , S100B + , and hTMEM119 + cells in 1-month organoids ( n = 3 from three independent experiments). (I) qPCR analysis of CSF1, IL-34, and IBA-1 mRNA in 1-month organoids ( n = 4 from four independent experiments). Student’s t test, * p < 0.05. (J) Normalized expression (TPM) of IL-34 gene from bulk RNA-seq data across astrocytes isolated from NPC organoids, pNPCs, and PMPs. Student’s t test, ** p < 0.01. (K) Normalized expression (TPM) of CSF1 gene from bulk RNA-seq data across astrocytes isolated from NPC organoids, pNPCs, and PMPs. Student’s t test, * p < 0.05. (L and M) Representative images (L) and quantification (M) of CD44 + , CSF1 + , and IL34 + cells in 1-month organoids ( n = 11 and n = 6 organoids were analyzed from independent experiments for CD44/CSF1 and IL34/CSF1 staining, respectively). (N) A schematic diagram showing that hiPSC and hESC-derived PMP and v-NPCs are engrafted into the brains of P0 Rag2 −/− mice. (O and P) Representative images (O) and quantification (P) of NeuN + , OLIG2 + , GFAP + , and IBA-expressing cells in the brains of Rag2 −/− mouse ( n = 3 mice). Arrows: NeuN + , OLIG2 + , GFAP + , and IBA1 + cells colocalized with hN + -human cells. Scale bars: 20 μm.

Article Snippet: IL-34 (Interleukin-34) , Thermo Fisher Scientific , Hs01050926_m1.

Techniques: Co-Culture Assay, Expressing, RNA Sequencing, Isolation, Staining, Derivative Assay

Journal: Development (Cambridge, England)

Article Title: CSF1R ligands promote microglial proliferation but are not the sole regulators of developmental microglial proliferation

doi: 10.1242/dev.204610

Figure Lengend Snippet: CSF1R ligands boost microglial proliferation in serum-free primary microglial culture. (A) Schematic of immunopanning for the isolation and culture of murine microglia. I. V., in vitro . Schematic created in BioRender by Ho, M. 2025. https://BioRender.com/zvx72w4 . This figure was sublicensed under CC-BY 4.0 terms. (B) A plot of the percentage of total Cd11b + microglia that were KI67 + after a 72-h treatment of 10 ng/ml of each predicted signalling factor in microglial base media. (C) Representative images of proliferative microglia (CD11b + KI67 + ) at 1000 ng/ml. Scale bars: 100 µm. (D) A plot of the mean percentage of microglia that are proliferative at tenfold increasing concentrations of CSF1 or IL34. (E) A plot of the mean percentage of viable microglial sustained by tenfold increasing concentrations of CSF1 or IL34. BM here indicates a microglial base media control supplemented with 2 ng/ml TGFβ2; GM indicates microglial growth media control containing both 2 ng/ml TGFβ2 and 10 ng/ml CSF1. (F) A plot of the percentage of live microglia sustained by BM containing either 1 ng/ml or 10 ng/ml CSF1. Bars represent mean±s.e.m.; B: n =2, D-F: n =3, independent microglial cultures with treatments in triplicate or quadruplicate. **** P <0.0001 (one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc). ns, not significant.

Article Snippet: For dose response experiments, we created tenfold dilutions of CSF1 (Gibco, 315-02) and IL34 (R&D Systems, 5195-ML) in microglial growth media.

Techniques: Isolation, In Vitro, Control

Journal: Development (Cambridge, England)

Article Title: CSF1R ligands promote microglial proliferation but are not the sole regulators of developmental microglial proliferation

doi: 10.1242/dev.204610

Figure Lengend Snippet: CSF1 and IL34 protein increase throughout development and display distinct spatiotemporal transcriptional expression patterns. (A,B) IL34 (A) and CSF1 (B) protein levels in whole-brain homogenates as measured by ELISA. (C) Representative brain microscopy image with regions of interest outlined in red. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D,F) Representative images of Il34 transcript visualized with RNAscope™ in CA1 (D) and somatosensory cortex (F). Scale bars: 40 µm. (E,G) Plots of the mean percentage of total cells of CA1 (E) and somatosensory cortex (G) that are Il34 + across development. (H,J) Representative images of Csf1 transcript visualized with RNAscope™ in CA1 (H) and somatosensory cortex (J). Scale bars: 40 µm. (I,K) Plots of the mean percentage of total cells of CA1 (I) and somatosensory cortex (K) that are Csf1 + across development. (L) Density maps depicting the spatiotemporal expression patterns of Il34 and Csf1 transcripts in RNAscope™ across development. Warmer colours indicate greater, while cooler colours indicate lower, transcript density. Bars represent mean±s.e.m.; A,B: n =5 mice per time point; E: n =3-5 mice per time point, G: n =4-5 mice per time point, I,K: n =2-3 mice per time point. * P <0.05, **** P <0.0001 (one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc).

Article Snippet: For dose response experiments, we created tenfold dilutions of CSF1 (Gibco, 315-02) and IL34 (R&D Systems, 5195-ML) in microglial growth media.

Techniques: Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Microscopy, RNAscope

Journal: Development (Cambridge, England)

Article Title: CSF1R ligands promote microglial proliferation but are not the sole regulators of developmental microglial proliferation

doi: 10.1242/dev.204610

Figure Lengend Snippet: CSF1R signalling is largely restricted to microglia and border-associated macrophages in the P7 hippocampus. (A) UMAP plot depicting the cellular populations of the P7 hippocampus. Dots represent individual cells clustered based on transcriptional similarity, while colours indicate distinct cell lineages or cellular states based on gene expression patterns. (B) UMAP plot depicting expression of Csf1r in the P7 hippocampus. (C) UMAP plot depicting expression of Csf1 in the P7 hippocampus. (D) UMAP plot depicting expression of Il34 in the P7 hippocampus. (E) Dot plot depicting the cell population expression levels of Csf1r , Csf1 and Il34 in the P7 hippocampus. (F) CellChat plot predicting the dominant sender populations that secrete CSF1 and IL34 and dominant receiver populations that receive signalling via CSF1R in the P7 hippocampus. (G) Violin plot depicting the expression of microglial Csf1r across the mouse lifespan. (H) UMAP plot depicting inhibitory neurons, excitatory neurons and non-neuronal cells of the adult hippocampus. Dots represent individual cells clustered based on transcriptional similarity, while colours indicate distinct cell lineages or cellular states based on gene expression patterns. (I) UMAP plot depicting expression of Il34 in the adult hippocampus. (J) Violin plot comparing the expression level of Il34 between inhibitory neurons, excitatory neurons and non-neuronal cells of the adult hippocampus. Datasets for A-F: ; G: ; H-J: . G,J: **** P <0.0001 (one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc).

Article Snippet: For dose response experiments, we created tenfold dilutions of CSF1 (Gibco, 315-02) and IL34 (R&D Systems, 5195-ML) in microglial growth media.

Techniques: Gene Expression, Expressing

Journal: Development (Cambridge, England)

Article Title: CSF1R ligands promote microglial proliferation but are not the sole regulators of developmental microglial proliferation

doi: 10.1242/dev.204610

Figure Lengend Snippet: Unaltered Il34 and Csf1 levels of IL1α and IL1β knockout mice are insufficient to explain aberrant developmental microglial proliferation. (A) Representative whole brain microscopy image with analysed regions of interest outlined in red. (B) Representative images of IBA1 + microglia (red) and KI67 + proliferative cells (white) in the P10 hippocampus and cortex of IL1α and IL1β knockout mice. Scale bars: 40 µm. (C,D) Plots of the mean percentage of hippocampal microglia (C) and somatosensory cortex microglia (D) that are proliferating in wild-type (WT), IL1α and IL1β knockout mice across development. (E,F) Plots of mean hippocampal microglial densities (E) and mean somatosensory cortex microglial densities (F) in WT, IL1α and IL1β knockout mice. (G,H) Plots of the mean percentage of total cells of CA1 that are Il34 + (G) or Csf1 + (H) at P10 in WT, IL1α and IL1β knockout mice. (I,J) Plots of the mean percentage of total cells of somatosensory cortex that are Il34 + (I) or Csf1 + (J) at P10 in WT, IL1α and IL1β knockout mice. Bars represent mean±s.e.m.; C-F: n =6-8 mice per time point; G,I: n =5 mice per genotype; H,J: n =3-5 mice per genotype. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001, **** P <0.0001 (C-F: two-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc; G-J: one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc).

Article Snippet: For dose response experiments, we created tenfold dilutions of CSF1 (Gibco, 315-02) and IL34 (R&D Systems, 5195-ML) in microglial growth media.

Techniques: Knock-Out, Microscopy